Preview

iPolytech Journal

Advanced search

STUDY OF PRIMARY MACHINING TYPE INFLUENCE ON THE QUALITY OF WELDED LIGHTWEIGHT ALUMINUM ALLOY STRUCTURES

https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2018-7-10-18

Abstract

The article presents the study results of welded joints from the aluminum alloy of Al-Fe-Si system. The purpose of welding is to obtain aircraft parts. The challenge of joining light-weight skin-type parts consists in frequent defects such as flatness deviations and joint surface geometry changes caused by spot resistance welding. As the adjustment of welding mode and conditions has not yielded favorable results a decision was made to study the influence of previous operations of the technological process. The PURPOSE of this work is to study the influence of the types of primary machining of aluminum alloy sheet parts on the quality of welded joints obtained by spot resistance welding. METHODS. The influence of the blank production method and sample sheet rolling direction at nesting on the quality of welded joints has been determined experimentally. RESULTS AND THEIR DISCUSSION. The best results after welding have been obtained on the parts made by chemical dimensional etching. After resistance welding of such samples with the thinning windows of 0.9 mm and 1.1 mm regardless of the sheet nesting direction the defects were not found. After resistance welding on parts with the thinning windows of 0.68 - 0.75 mm, 0.88-0.96 performed by the mechanical processing method regardless of the sheet nesting direction the defects in the form of bucklings were identified. The parts with the increased thickness of 1.15 mm do not feature any surface deviations from flatness after welding. CONCLUSIONS. It has been determined that the appearance of geometry integrity defects after spot resistance welding on samples does not depend on the direction of sheet nesting but depends on the type of machining and the thickness of thinning windows. The residual deformation after machining can be reduced by decreasing the depth of thinning, i.e. increasing the part thickness in the thinning windows to the maximum allowable value of 1.15 mm. This eliminates the possibility of defects after welding in the form of surface crowns.

About the Authors

N. A. Astafieva
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation


A. S. Buzin
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Козловский С.Н. Основы теории и технологии контактной точечной сварки: монография. Красноярск: Изд-во СибГАУ, 2003. 230 с.

2. Тюдешев В.С., Кочергин Д.А., Подрезов Н.В., Козловский С.Н. Искривление деталей при их сближении в процессе точечной сварки // Актуальные проблемы авиации и космонавтики. 2015. Т. 1. № 11. С. 272-273.

3. Орлов Б.Д., Чулошников П.Л. [и др.]. Контроль точечной и роликовой электросварки. М.: Машиностроение, 1973. 304 с.

4. Царегородцева М.М., Шпигоревская М.И., Козловский С.Н. Определение устойчивости процесса точечной сварки по технологическим параметрам // Актуальные проблемы авиации и космонавтики. 2013. Т. 1. № 9. С. 120-121.

5. Lum I., Fukumoto S., Biro E., Boomer D.R., Zhou Y. Electrode Pitting in Resistance Spot Welding of Aluminum Alloy 5182 // Metallurgical and materials transactions. 2004. Vol. 35A. P. 217-225.

6. Rashid M., Medley J.B., Zhou Y. Electrode Worksheet Interface Behaviour During Resistance Spot Welding of Al Alloy 5182 // Science and Technology of Welding and Joining. 2009. Vol. 14 (4). P. 295-304.

7. Khan J.A., Xu L., Chao Y.J. Prediction of Nugget Development During Resistance Spot Welding Using Coupled Thermal-Electrical-Mechanical Model // Science and Technology of Welding and Joining. 1999. Vol. 4 (4). P. 201-207.

8. Куликов В.П., Фурманов С.М. Пути снижения деформации лицевых поверхностей изделий при контактной точечной сварке // Сварочные технологии и оборудование. 2003. № 3. С. 16-27.

9. Линдт Е.В., Мужикбаев А.С., Козловский С.Н. Пластические деформации металла при точечной контактной сварке // Актуальные проблемы авиации и космонавтики. 2015. Т. 1. № 11. С. 259-260.

10. Гуреева М.А., Грушко О.Е., Клочков Г.Г. Исследование свойств сварных соединений алюминиевого сплава В1341, выполненных контактной точечной сваркой // Заготовительные производства в машиностроении 2016. № 7. С. 8-12.

11. Попковский В.А., Березиенко В.П. Поле остаточных напряжений при контактной точечной сварке // Автоматическая сварка. 1987. № 8. С. 10-14.

12. Han L., Thornton M., Boomer D., Shergold M. Effect of aluminium sheet surface conditions on feasibility and quality of resistance spot welding // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2010. Vol. 210. No. 8. P. 1076-1082.

13. Karimi M.R., Sedighi M., Afshari D. Thermal contact conductance effect in modeling of resistance spot welding process of aluminum alloy 6061-T6 // The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2015. Vol. 77. No. 5-8. P. 885-895.


Review

For citations:


Astafieva N.A., Buzin A.S. STUDY OF PRIMARY MACHINING TYPE INFLUENCE ON THE QUALITY OF WELDED LIGHTWEIGHT ALUMINUM ALLOY STRUCTURES. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2018;22(7):10-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2018-7-10-18

Views: 220


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-4004 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6341 (Online)