Polyurethane foam insulation: Causes of failure in district heating systems

This study investigates the mechanisms of defect formation in polyurethane foam (PUF) insulation used in pipelines for energy and central heating applications. The research focuses on PUF insulation placed between a steel pipe and a polyethylene casing. A numerical thermomechanical analysis was performed using ANSYS software on a U-shaped section of an insulated pipe to simulate the operational conditions with a heat-transfer fluid temperature of 130°C and ambient temperatures varying from –20°C to +20°C in 5°C increments. Various causes of insulation defects were examined, including manufacturing factors (e.g., uneven application, incorrect foaming temperature, and moisture contamination), mechanical loads (impact and vibration), and thermal stress. The PUF failure process, which involves condensation, corrosion, and chemical degradation, is described. The investigation established that significant stress concentrations occur at the bends of pipes covered with PUF insulation. The maximum von Mises stress was determined to be 0.45678 MPa at an ambient temperature of –20°C with a temperature differential of 150°C between the fluid and environment. This value approaches the ultimate strength of the polyurethane foam, indicating that cyclic compression and expansion processes can initiate defects and lead to subsequent degradation of the insulating layer. Thus, the study demonstrates that thermal loads, along with manufacturing defects and mechanical impacts, are the primary factors in the formation of defects in PUF, such as cracks, delamination, and fatigue, which compromise the structural integrity and thermal performance of insulated pipes.

1. Kuznik I.V., Kolubkov A.N., Il’in E.T., Belov V.M., Mikhailov M.A., Plekhov A.G., et al. Methods for improving energy efficiency in district heating. Santehnika. Otoplenie. Kondicionirovanie. 2017;10. Available from: https://www.c-o-k.ru/articles/metody-povysheniya-energoeffektivnosti-v-centralizovannom-teplosnabzhenii [Accessed 15th February 2025]. (In Russ.).

2. Vankov Y.V., Ziganshin S.G., Gorbunova T.G., Politova T.O., Khabibullin R.M. Analysis of damage to heating systems Kazan and develop recommendations to improve reliability. Power Engineering: Research, Equipment, Technology. 2012;7-8:9-18. (In Russ.). EDN: PHGHNB.

3. Ostrogorsky A.G., Glicksman L.R., Reitz D.W. Aging of polyurethane foams. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1986;29(8):1169-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(86)90148-1.

4. Tesser R., Di Serio M., Sclafani A., Santacesaria E. Modeling of polyurethane foam formation. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2004;92(3):1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20170.

5. McDonough W., Braungart M., Anastas P.T., Zimmerman J.B. Peer reviewed: applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. Environmental Science and Technology. 2003;37(23):434A−441A. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0326322.

6. Eriksson D., Sundén B. Heat and mass transfer in polyurethane insulated district cooling and heating pipes. Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science. 1998;22(1):49-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/109719639802200105.

7. Vega A., Yarahmadi N., Jakubowicz I. Determination of the long-term performance of district heating pipes through accelerated ageing. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2018;153:15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.003.

8. Gaidukovs S., Gaidukova G., Ivdre A., Cabulis U. Viscoelastic and thermal properties of polyurethane foams obtained from renewable and recyclable components. Journal of Renewable Materials. 2018;6(7):755-763. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2018.634112.

9. Menges G., Knipschild F. Estimation of mechanical properties for rigid polyurethane foams. Polymer Engineering and Science. 1975;15(8):623-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760150810.

10. Chen Yichong, Li Dongyang, Zhang Hong, Ling Yijie, Wu Kaiwen, Tao Liu, et al. Antishrinking strategy of microcellular thermoplastic polyurethane by comprehensive modeling analysis. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2021;60(19):7155-7166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00895. EDN: RUIENS.

11. Doyle L., Weidlich I., Illguth M. Anisotropy in polyurethane pre-insulated pipes. Polymers. 2019;11(12):2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11122074.

12. Doyle L., Weidlich I. Moisture uptake and effects of hygrothermal exposure on closed-cell semicrystalline polyethylene terephthalate foam. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2022;202:110009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110009. EDN: GUGMWJ.

13. Pellizzi E., Lattuati-Derieux A., Lavédrine B., Cheradame H. Degradation of polyurethane ester foam artifacts: chemical properties, mechanical properties and comparison between accelerated and natural degradation. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2014;107:255-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.018.

14. Cotgreave T., Shortall J.B. Failure mechanisms in fibre reinforced rigid polyurethane foam. Journal of Cellular Plastics. 1977;13(4):240-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955X7701300401.

15. Doyle L., Weidlich I. Effects of thermal and mechanical cyclic loads on polyurethane pre-insulated pipes. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures. 2021;44(1):156-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13347. EDN: SQMJKG.

16. Yarahmadi N., Vega A., Jakubowicz I. Accelerated ageing and degradation characteristics of rigid polyurethane foam. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2017;138:192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.03.012.

17. Kakroodi A.R., Khazabi M., Maynard K., Sain M., Kwon Oh-Sung. Soy-based polyurethane spray foam insulations for light weight wall panels and their performances under monotonic and static cyclic shear forces. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015;74:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.092.

18. Johns A.I., Scott A.C., Watson J.T.R., Ferguson D., Clifford A.A. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of gases by the transient hot-wire method. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. Series: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 1988;325(1585):295-356. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1988.0054.

19. McLinden M.O., Klein S.A., Perkins R.A. An extended corresponding states model for the thermal conductivity of refrigerants and refrigerant mixtures. International Journal of Refrigeration. 2000;23(1):43-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00024-9. EDN: LTDREZ.

20. Ridha M., Shim V.P.W. Microstructure and tensile mechanical properties of anisotropic rigid polyurethane foam. Experimental Mechanics. 2008;48(6):763-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-008-9146-0. EDN: ZMUTPG.