Accuracy and process performance in the inspection of complex geometry as a function of scanning parameters

This study examines the effects of scanning mesh resolution on the measurement accuracy and duration for parts with double curvature. The research employed a standard aircraft component, referred to as a hatch base. This component features a double curvature that conforms to the external contours of an airplane. Measurements were carried out using a portable Scantech KSCAN Magic scanner, which captures part geometry without a fixed datum using positional markers. This scanner has a linear accuracy of 0.020 mm, repeatability of 0.010 mm, volumetric accuracy of 0.015 mm + 0.030 mm/m, and resolution of 0.010 mm. Geometric inspection was performed on the external and internal surfaces of the part. The analysis involved a curve constructed along the part surface and specific datum features, namely, hole centers. For both the reference model and scanned data, the intersection points of each hole axis with the part surface were determined to construct these curves. The results demonstrate that an increase in resolution from 0.1 mm to 0.025 mm significantly extends the scanning time, thereby reducing the geometric inspection throughput by nearly a factor of four, without a corresponding improvement in accuracy. To enhance the measurement accuracy of critical features, such as holes or complex geometry zones, it is recommended to apply a combined inspection method involving scanning with locally increased resolution on concave and critical surfaces. The study established that a mesh resolution of 0.1 mm represents the most rational choice for real-world production environments, as it provides acceptable accuracy with minimal time investment. The implementation of such optimized scanning strategies can reduce the duration of quality control operations while maintaining the required quality standards for the manufactured parts.

1. Wang Xinfeng, Liu Qing, Jia Kun, Zhang Yan, Zhang Haiyin, Zhen Jia. Study of aircraft skin defect detection and characterization methods. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Information, Communication and Networks. 17–20 August 2023, Xi’an. Xi’an: IEEE; 2023, р. 743-750. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICN59530.2023.10393190.

2. Mikeš P. Influence of stylus system configuration on the variability of measurement result on CMM. Manufacturing Technology. 2016;16(1):184-188. https://doi.org/10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/1/184.

3. Savilov A.V., Pyatykh A.S., Timofeev S.A. Analysis of advanced transpedicular screw machining technologies. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2020;24(6):1190-1198. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2020-6-1190-1198. EDN: QCGMNJ.

4. Van Brügge L., Çetin K.M., Koeberle S.J., Thiele M., Sturm F., Hornung M. Application of 3D-scanning for structural and geometric assessment of aerospace structures. CEAS Aeronautical Journal. 2023;14:455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-023-00654-1.

5. Kudryashova I.A., Belyakova V.A. Coordinate-measuring machines: comparative analysis of characteristics, recommendations for application. Proceedings of the Tula State University. Technical Science. 2022;4:302-307. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6168-2022-4-302-307. EDN: UJJYDK.

6. Urban Ja., Beranek L., Koptiš M., Šimota Ja., Košťák O. Influence of CMM scanning speed and inspected feature size on an accuracy of size and form measurement. Manufacturing Technology. 2020;20(4):538-544. https://doi.org/10.21062/mft.2020.074. EDN: FHCOPM.

7. Melichar M., Kubatova D., Kutlwaser J. Influence of CMM velocity on scanning precision. In: 28th International DAAAM Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. 8–11 November 2017, Vienna. Vienna: DAAAM International; 2017, p. 0400-0409. https://doi.org/10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.056.

8. Geng Jason. Structured-light 3D surface imaging: a tutorial. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 2011;3(2):128-160. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.3.000128.

9. Gura D.A., Dyachenko R.A., Andryushchenko A.V., Belokon I.A., Stepanenko V.E. The device and the principle of operation of a ground-based laser scanner on the example of the LEICA SCANSTATION C10. In: Nauchnye chteniya imeni professora N.E. Zhukovskogo. Sbornik nauchnyh statej XIII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Scientific readings named after the Professor N.E. Zhukovsky: collected scientific articles of the 13th International scientific and practical conference. 21–22 December 2022, Krasnodar. Krasnodar: Krasnodar higher military aviation school named after the Hero of the Soviet Union A. K. Serov; 2023, р. 357-361. Krasnodar, 2023, p. 357-361. (In Russ.). EDN: OKSYFM.

10. Antipov D.V., Efremkin O.S., Samokhvalov V.N., Eskina E.V. Determination of systematic errors that appear during the measurements by laser tracker. Proceedings of the Tula State University. Technical Science. 2021;11:531-538. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6168-2021-11-531-538. EDN: QLPYXF.

11. He Jiajue, Xiong Wei. Surface feature extraction method for cloud data of aircraft wall panel measurement points. Journal of Computational Science. 2024;83:102427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102427. EDN: XLCWXG.

12. Suvorov V.A., Kirillovskii M.A., Petrov V.V., Izyumova V.A. Laser scanning of aircraft prototype and model surfaces. Dopolnenie k materialam KIMILA-2020. Dopolnenie k materialam IV Otraslevoj konferencii po izmeritel’noj tekhnike i metrologii KIMILA-2020 = Supplement to the materials of the 4th Industry Conference on Measuring Technology and Metrology KIMILA-2020. 10–11 November 2021, Zhukovskii. Zhukovskii: Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute; 2021, р. 29-53. (In Russ.). EDN: QAQASB.

13. Ru Wang. Research on measuring method of RVSM regional waviness. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. Vol. 1635. Iss. 1. P. 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1635/1/012006. EDN: KUKKLF.

14. Kumar A.S., Chandrasekaran C. Analysis of dynamic probing errors in measuring machines. In: Chandrasekhar U., Yang L.J., Gowthaman S. (eds.). Innovative Design, Analysis and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2019, р. 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2697-4_51.

15. Ziout A., Qudeiri J.A., Murad M., Khader R., Alwahedi F., Khaleel A., et al. Exploring photogrammetry/3D scanning technology for quality control process in an aerospace manufacturing company. In: 13th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 7–9 March 2023, Manila. Manila: IEOM Society International; 2023, p. 2261-2268. https://doi.org/10.46254/AN13.20230605.

16. Bu Huahai, Huang Nuodi, Huang Jie, Liu Gang, Wang Yuhan, Zhu Limin. Geometric feature extraction and its profile accuracy evaluation for pockets on curved aircraft skin from scanned point clouds. Measurement Science and Technology. 2025;36(1):015021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad8cfc. EDN: WXQMFG.

17. Kyle S. Explore3DM – a directory and more for 3D metrology. Standards. 2021;1(2):67-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/standards1020007.

18. Radvar-Esfahlan H., Tahan S.-A. Nonrigid geometric metrology using generalized numerical inspection fixtures. Precision Engineering. 2012;36(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.07.002.

19. Pressley A. Elementary differential geometry, by Andrew Pressley. The Mathematical Gazette. Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. 2001;85(503):372-373. https://doi.org/10.2307/3622071.

20. Babanezhad K., Foucault G., Sabri V., Tahan A., Bigeon J. The fixtureless inspection of flexible parts based on semi-geodesic distance. Precision Engineering. 2019;59:174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precio-sioneng.2019.07.002.