Preview

iPolytech Journal

Advanced search

Review of methods for researching energy security. Modeling

https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2025-2-234-251

EDN: SXHDRC

Abstract

The paper aims to review literature sources that provide an assessment of energy security and energy supply reliability. Various methods for modeling energy systems presented in the sources are compared and evaluated. About 50 scientific articles and reviews selected from scientific indexes (including IEEE, Web of Science, and Scopus) were studied using the keywords “energy security”, “energy supply reliability”, “large-scale systems”, and “bottleneck analysis”. A systematic review method for reviewing specialized sources according to article categories was applied to provide a well-defined structure for the given research area. A comprehensive review of literature sources and analysis of the methods of modeling power systems presented in the papers was carried out. Emphasis was placed on the sources in which analysis of energy security and reliability of energy supply was selected as the primary function of the presented model. Works having other target functions (cost minimization, profit maximization, etc.) were also considered to provide a comparison of the applied modeling methods for different target functions. Most studies were found to focus on modeling energy systems of different scales, from individual buildings to national or regional power grids, and to be mainly aimed at minimizing energy costs or maximizing profits. Conversely, less research has focused on energy scarcity minimization and reliability assessment, indicating a significant research gap and highlighting the need for further research in this critical area. The results of the presented literature review clarify the application of various methods of modeling energy systems in the analysis of energy security and reliability of fuel and energy supply, as well as in other target functions. It is concluded that similar modeling methods are used for diverse target functions. Static nonlinear models, representing the most widely used approach, will be used as a basis for further research.

About the Authors

D. S. Krupenev
Melentiev Energy Systems Institute of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Dmitry S. Krupenev, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Fuel and Energy Supply Reliability; Associate Professor of the Department of Power Supply and Electrical Engineering, Irkutsk National Research Technical University

130 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664033

83, Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074



V. M. Shchukina
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Viktoria M. Shchukina, Postgraduate Student, Assistant Professor of the Thermal Power Engineering Department

83, Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074



References

1. Yong Pei, Wang Yi, Capuder T., Tan Zhenfei, Zhang Ning, Kang Chongqing. Steady-state security region of en - ergy hub: Modeling, calculation, and applications. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 2021;125:106551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106551.

2. Mohammadi M., Noorollahi Yо., Mohammadi-ivatloo B., Hosseinzadeh M., Yousefi H., Khorasani S.T. Optimal management of energy hubs and smart energy hubs – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;89:33-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.035.

3. Chen Yue, Wei Wei, Liu Feng, Wu Qiuwei, Mei Shengwei. Analyzing and validating the economic efficiency of manm - aging a cluster of energy hubs in multi-carrier energy systems. Applied Energy. 2018;230:403-416. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.112.

4. Voropai N.I., Ukolova E.V., Gerasimov D.O., Suslov K.V., Lombardi P., Komarnicki P. Study of a multi-power fa - cility by simulation modeling methods. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2018;22(12):157-168. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2018-12-157-168.

5. Sadeghi H., Rashidinejad M., Moeini-Aghtaie M., Abdollahi A. The energy hub: an extensive survey on the state-of-the-art. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019;161:114071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114071.

6. Papadimitriou C.N., Anastasiadis A.G., Psomopoulos C.S., Vokas G.А. Demand response schemes in energy hubs: a comparison study. Energy Procedia. 2019;157:939-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.260.

7. Suslov K., Piskunova V., Gerasimov D., Ukolova E., Akhmetshin A., Lombardi P., et al. Development of the methodological basis of the simulation modelling of the multi-energy systems. In: E3S Web of Conferences. 2019;124:01049. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912401049.

8. Wan Yi, Kober T., Schildhauer T., Schmidt T.J., McKenna R., Densing M., et al. Conditions for profitable operation of P2X energy hubs to meet local demand under to with energy market access. Advances in Applied Energy. 2023;10:100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2023.100127.

9. Maroufmashat A., Elkamel A., Fowler M., Sattari S., Roshandel R., Hajimiragha A., et al. Modeling and optimization of a network of energy hubs to improve economic and emission considerations. Energy. 2015; 93(2):2546-2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.079.

10. Mobarakeh A. I., Sadeghi R., Esfahani H.S., Delshad M. Optimal planning and operation of energy hub by considering demand response algorithms and uncertainties based on problem-solving approach in discrete and continuous space. Electric Power Systems Research. 2023;214(А):108859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108859.

11. Ahmadisedigh H., Gosselin L. Combined heating and cooling networks with waste heat recovery based on eneregy hub concept. Applied Energy. 2019;253:113495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113495.

12. Wu Di, Han Zhonghe, Liu Zhijian, Li Peng, Ma Fanfan, Zhang Han, et al. Comparative study of optimization method and optimal operation strategy for multiscenario integrated energy system. Energy. 2020;217:119311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119311.

13. Li Peng, Wang Zixuan, Yang Weihong, Liu Haitao, Yin Yunxing, Wang Jiahao, et al. Hierarchically partitioned coordinated operation of distributed integrated energy system based on a master-slave game. Energy. 2021;214:119006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119006.

14. Nikmehr N. Distributed robust operational optimization of networked microgrids embedded interconnected energy hubs. Energy. 2020;199:117440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117440.

15. Liu Wen Hui, Ho Wai Shin, Lee Ming Yang, Hashim H., Lim Jeng Shiun, Klemeš J.J., et al. Development and optimization of an integrated energy network with centralized and decentralized energy systems using mathematical modelling approach. Energy. 2019;183:617-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.158.

16. Dou Xun, Wang Jun, Wang Zhen, Ding Tao, Wang Shizhen. A decentralized multi-energy resources aggregation strategy based on bi-level interactive transactions of virtual energy plant. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 2021;124:106356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106356.

17. Chi Lixun, Su Huai, Zio Enrico, Zhang Jinjun, Li Xueyi, Li Zhang, et al. Integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety analysis of integrated energy systems with bi-directional conversion. Energy. 2020;212:118685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118685.

18. Beér J.M. High efficiency electric power generation: the environmental role. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2007;33(2):107-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.08.002.

19. Acosta C., Siu N. Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: application to steam generator tube rupture. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 1993;41(2):135-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(93)90027-V.

20. Dokic S.B., Rajakovic N.L. Security modelling of integrated gas and electrical power systems by analyzing critical situations and potentials for performance optimization. Energy. 2019;184:141-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.165.

21. Dobrynina Y.E., Krupenev D.S. Consideration of system security criteria in the models of power system unit commitment. iPolytech Journal. 2024;28(2):273-289. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2024-2-273-289. EDN: QFANFX.

22. Kozlov M.V., Malashenko Y.E., Nazarova I.A., Novikova N.M. Fuel and energy system control at large-scale dam - ages. 1. Network model and software implementation. Journal of Computer and System Sciences International. 2017;6:50-73. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0002338817060051. EDN: ZVGFGV.

23. Malashenko Y.E., Nazarova I.A., Novikova N.M. Fuel and energy system control at large-scale damages. II. Optimization problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences International. 2018;2:39-51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S000233881802004X. EDN: YWSLYO.

24. Zorkaltsev V.I. Forecasting and analysis methods of operation efficiency of fuel supply systems. Moscow: Nauka; 1988, 144. (In Russ.).

25. Seleznev A.V. Software package for solving the selection problem of the composition of switched-on generating equipment in the conditions of a competitive electricity market in Russia. In: Upravlenie razvitiem krupnomasshtabnyh sistem MLSD\’2015 = Management of MLSD’2015 large-scale system development. 29 September – 1 October 2015, Moscow. Moscow: V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2015, vol. 1, р. 281-290. EDN: WECDVH. (In Russ.).

26. Antonov G.N., Cherkesov G.P., Krivorukiy L.D. Methods and models for studying energy systems survivability. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1990, 285 р. (In Russ).

27. Alekseev A.V., Barakhtenko E.A., Voitov O.N. Hierarchical modeling of energy systems / eds. N.I. Voropai, V.A. Stennikov. Novosibirsk: Geo; 2020, 314 р. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.21782/V978-5-6043021-9-4.

28. Senderov S.M., Rabchuk V.I., Pyatkova N.I. Methodological approach to the creation of a device for analyzing consumers’ fuel and energy supply reliability under negative impacts on fuel and energy complex facility operation. Metodicheskie voprosy issledovaniya nadezhnosti bol’shih sistem energetiki: materialy XCIII zasedaniya seminara = Methodological issues in studying large energy system reliability: Proceedings of the 93d seminar session. 13–17 September 2021, Volzhskij. Irkutsk: Melentiev Energy Systems Institute of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2021, vol. 1, iss. 72, р. 52-61. (In Russ). EDN: JCKRBD.

29. Qin Chun, Wang Linqing, Han Zhongyang, Zhao Jun, Liu Quanli. Weighted directed graph based matrix modeling of integrated energy systems. Energy. 2021;214:118886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118886.

30. Yang Xiaohui, Chen Zaixing, Huang Xin, Li Ruixin, Xu Shaoping, Yang Chunsheng. Robust capacity optimization methods for integrated energy systems considering demand response and thermal comfort. Energy. 2021;221:119727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119727.

31. Cheng Xin, Zheng Yun, Lin Yong, Chen Lei, Wang Yunqi, Qiu Jing. Hierarchical operation planning based on car - bon-constrained locational marginal price for integrated energy system. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 2021;128:106714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106714.

32. Zhou Kaile, Wei Shuyu, Yang Shanlin. Time-of-use pricing model based on power supply chain for user-side microgrid. Applied Energy. 2019;248(1):35-43.

33. Wang Yongli, Ma Yuze, Song Fuhao, Ma Yang, Qi Chengyuan, Huang Feifei. Economic and efficient multi-objective operation optimization of integrated energy system considering electro-thermal demand response. Energy. 2020;205:118022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118022.

34. Liu Mingxi, Shi Yang, Fang Fang. Optimal power flow and PGU capacity of CCHP systems using a matrix modeling approach. Applied Energy. 2013;102:794-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.041.

35. Aldarajee A.H.M., Hosseinian S.H., Vahidi B. A secure tri-level planner-disaster-risk-averse replanner mod - el for enhancing the resilience of energy systems. Energy. 2020;204:117916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117916.

36. Cornell C., Dinh Nam Trong, Pourmousavi S.A. A probabilistic forecast methodology for volatile electricity prices in the Australian national electricity market. International Journal of Forecasting. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.12.003.

37. Sawas A.M., Khani H., El-Taweel N.A., Farag H.E.Z. Comparative Time-of-Use and wholesale electricity price-based scheduling in embedded power and natural gas distribution grids penetrated with large renewable generation. Electric Power Systems Researсh. 2019;177(8):105975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSR.2019.105975.

38. Zhang Zhihan, Yu Wenhao, Yu Mengxia, Guo Zhichun, Jiang Meng. A survey of multi-task learning in natural lan - guage processing: regarding task relatedness and training methods. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023;39:943-956. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.66.

39. Nikmehr N., Najafi-Ravadanegh S., Khodaei A. Probabilistic optimal scheduling of networked microgrids considering time-based demand response programs under uncertainty. Applied Energy. 2017;198:267-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.071.

40. Sun Yujun, Wang Yan, Wang Beibei, Li Yang, Xiao Yong, Li Qiushuo. Multi-time scale decision method for source-load interaction considering demand response uncertainty. Automation of Electric Power Systems. 2018;42(2):106-113. https://doi.org/10.7500/AEPS20170416004.

41. Flottmann J. Australian energy policy decisions in the wake of the 2022 energy crisis. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2024;81:238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.025.

42. Xiang Yue, Cai Hanhi, Gu Chenghong, Shen Xiaodong. Cost-benefit analysis of integrated energy system planning considering demand response. Energy. 2019;192(1):116632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116632.

43. Christensen Т.Н., Friis F., Bettin S., Throndsen W., Ornetzeder M., Skjølsvold T.M., et al. The role of competences, engagement, and devices in configuring the impact of prices in energy demand response: findings from three smart energy pilots with households. Energy Policy. 2020;137(11):111142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111142.

44. Shen Jianjian Shen, Cheng Chuntian, Zhang Xiufei, Zhou Binbin. Coordinated operations of multiplereservoir cascaded hydropower plants with cooperation benefit allocation. Energy. 2018;153:509-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.056.

45. Hasan K.N., Saha T.K., Chattopadhyay D., Eghbal M. Benefit-based expansion cost allocation for large scale remote renewable power integration into the Australian grid. Applied Energy. 2014;113:836-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.031.

46. Rai U., Oluleye G., Hawkes A. Stochastic optimisation model to determine the optimal contractual capacity of a distributed energy resource offered in a balancing services contract to maximise profit. Energy Reports.2024;11:5800-5818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.049.

47. Xu Zhongwen, Peng Zixuan, Yang Ling, Chen Xudong, Chen Xudong. An improved Shapley value method for a green supply chain income distribution mechanism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(9):1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091976.

48. Ragosa G., Watson J., Grubb M. The political economy of electricity system resource adequacy and renewable energy integration: a comparative study of Britain, Italy and California. Energy Research & Social Science. 2024;107:103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103335.

49. Westgaard S., Fleten S.-E., Negash A., Botterud A., Bogaard K., Verling T.H. Performing price scenario analysis and stress testing using quantile regression: a case study of the Californian electricity market. Energy. 2021;214:118796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118796.

50. Hirth L., Mühlenpfordt J., Bulkeley M. The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform – a review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform. Applied Energy. 2018;225:1054-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.048.

51. Augutis J., Krikstolaitis R., Martisauskas L., Pečiulytė S., Žutautaitė I. Integrated energy security assessment. Energy. 2017;138:890-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.113.

52. Augutis J., Krikstolaitis R., Martisauskas L., Urboniene S. Energy security levelassessment technology. Applied Energy. 2012;97:143-149. http://doi.org/0.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.032.

53. Augutis J., Krikstolaitis R., Peciulyte S., Žutautaitė l. Dynamic model based on Bayesian method for energy security assessment. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;101:66-72. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.002.

54. Augutis J., Krikstolaitis R., Peciulyte S., Konstantinavičiūtė I. Sustainable development and energy security level after Ignalina NPP shutdown. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2011;17(1):5-21. http://doi.org/10.3846/13928619.2011.553930.

55. Augutis J., Martisauskas L., Krikstolaitis R. Energy mix optimization from an energy security perspective. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;90:300-314. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.033.


Review

For citations:


Krupenev D.S., Shchukina V.M. Review of methods for researching energy security. Modeling. iPolytech Journal. 2025;29(2):234-251. https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2025-2-234-251. EDN: SXHDRC

Views: 12


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-4004 (Print)
ISSN 2782-6341 (Online)