Thermogravimetric analysis of the combustion of Tuva coals before and after their carbonization

   The process of combusting Tuva coals before and after their carbonization was studied using the methods of thermogravimetric analysis and electron microscopy. Coal samples were subjected to thermomechanical and elemental analysis, which revealed a higher content of volatile substances in Kaa-Khem coal (47.5 %) compared to Chadan coal (10 %). Following carbonization, a decrease in volatile substances to 11.5 % and 9.3 %, respectively, was observed. The conducted thermogravimetric analysis showed the ignition temperature of the coke residue of the Kaa-Khem and Chadan coal samples to increase by 76 °C and 90 °C, respectively, after carbonization. The burnup temperature of the coke residue after carbonizing (723 °C) Kaa-Khem coal samples remained effectively the same, while the Chadan coal showed an increase from 704 °C to 727 °C. The carbonization of coals was established to decrease the maximum reaction rate from 19 % per min to 10% per min for Kaa-Khem coal and from 26 % per min to 11 % per min for Chadan coal. The process of combusting the coke residue after coal carbonization was found to shift into the region of higher temperatures: from 448–723°C to 524–724°C for Kaa-Khem coal and from 436–704 °C to 526–727 °C for Chadan coal. A morphological analysis of the surface of coal particles after carbonization showed the appearance of larger-size pores and cracks on the surface of carbonates compared to coal before carbonization. The conclusion is made that the content of volatile substances, rather than the developed pore structure, comprises the main factor in improving the combustion characteristics of Tuva coals under the conditions of non-isothermal heating before and after their carbonization.

1. Lebedev N. I. Tuvinian Coals. Kyzyl: Tuvinian Institute for Exploration of Natural Resources of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2007, 180 р. (In Russ.).

2. Mongush G. R. Study of changes in specifications and chemical properties (using IR spectral analysis) of coal mixtures from Tuva deposits. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij = International Journal of Applied and Basic Research. 2019; 12-1: 157-162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/mjpfi.12973.

3. Chen Yixin, Lee Soonho, Tahmasebi A., Bai Jin, Vongsvivut Jitraporn, Yu Jitraporn. Chemical structure transformation during the later stage of plastic layers during coking using synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy technique. Fuel. 2020;273:117764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117764.

4. Chen Yixin, Lee Soonho, Tahmasebi Arash, Liu Mengjie, Zhang Tingting, Bai Jin, et al. Mechanism of carbon structure transformation in plastic layer and semicoke during coking of Australian metallurgical coals. Fuel. 2022; 315: 123205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123205.

5. Filippov S. P., Keiko A. V. Coal gasification: at the crossroad. Technological factors. Thermal Engineering. 2021; 68: 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521030046.

6. Loginov D. A., Chernykh A. P., Islamov S. R. An experimental study of the effect of pressure on the process of brown coal semicoking. Solid Fuel Chemistry. 2021; 55 (2): 129-132. https://doi.org/10.3103/S036152192102004X.

7. Zhuikov A. V., Matyushenko A. I., Panfilov V. I. Nastevich O. E. Experience of using synthetic gas as the main fuel in an industrial heating boiler house. Power Technology and Engineering. 2021; 55 (1): 92-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-021-01325-z.

8. Yang Yu, Lu Xiaofeng, Wang Quanhai. Investigation on the co-combustion of low calorific oil shale and its semicoke by using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 136: 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.006.

9. Zhang Xiaoyu, Zhu Shujun, Zhu Jianguo, Lyu Qinggang, Wei Kai, Huang Qian, et al. TG-MS study on co-combustion characteristics and coupling mechanism of coal gasification fly ash and coal gangue by ECSA®. Fuel. 2022; 314: 123086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123086.

10. Zhang Jinping, Jia Xiaowei, Wang Chang'an, Zhao Nan, Wang Pengqian, Che Defu. Experimental investigation on combustion and NO formation characteristics of semi-coke and bituminous coal blends. Fuel. 2019; 247: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.045.

11. Yao Huifeng, He Boshu, Ding Guangchao, Tong Wenxiao, Kuang Yucheng. Thermogravimetric analyses of oxy-fuel co-combustion of semi-coke and bituminous coal. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019; 156: 708-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.115.

12. Larina O. M., Sinelshchikov V. A., Sytchev G. A. Thermogravimetric analysis of fuel blends of biomass and high-ash coal-containing waste. High Temperature. 2020; 58 (5): 710-715. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X20050041.

13. Zheng Shaowei, Hu Yingjie, Wang Zhiqiang, Cheng Xingxing. Experimental investigation on ignition and burn-out characteristics of semi-coke and bituminous coal blends. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2020; 93 (4): 1373-1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2019.12.007.

14. Hu Lilin, Zhang Yang, Chen Denggao, Fang Jugang, Zhang Man, Wu Yuxin, et al. Experimental study on the combustion and NOx emission characteristics of a bituminous coal blended with semi-coke. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019;160:113993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113993.

15. Zhao Ruidong, Qin Jianguang, Chen Tianju, Wu Jinhu. TG-FTIR study on co-combustion of bituminous coal semicoke and lignite. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2022; 147: 1849-1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10405-7.

16. Xiao Zhongzheng, Wang Shuzhong, Luo Ming, Cai Jianjun. Combustion characteristics and synergistic effects during co-combustion of lignite and lignocellulosic components under oxy-fuel condition. Fuel. 2022; 310 (B): 122399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122399.

17. Wang Guangwei, Zhang Jianliang, Shao Jiugang, Liu Zhengjian, Zhang Guohua, Xu Tao, et al. Thermal behavior and kinetic analysis of co-combustion of waste biomass/low rank coal blends. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016; 124: 414-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.045.

18. Deng Shuanghui, Tan Houzhang, Wei Bo, Wang Xuebin, Yang Fuxin, Xiong Xiaohe. Investigation on combustion performance and ash fusion characteristics of Zhundong coal co-combustion with coal gangue. Fuel. 2021; 294: 120555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120555.

19. Zhang Kaihua, Zhang Kai, Cao Yan, Pan Wei-ping. Co-combustion characteristics and blending optimization of tobacco stem and high-sulfur bituminous coal based on thermogravimetric and mass spectrometry analyses. Bioresource Technology. 2013; 131: 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.163.

20. Oladejo J. M., Adegbite S., Pang Cheng Heng, Liu Hao, Parvez A. M., Wu Tao. A novel index for the study of synergistic effects during the co-processing of coal and biomass. Applied Energy. 2017;188:215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.005.

21. Chen Lichun, Wen Chang, Wang Wenyu, Liu Tianyu, Liu Enze, Liu Haowen, et al. Combustion behaviour of biochars thermally pretreated via torrefaction, slow pyrolysis, or hydrothermal carbonisation and co-fired with pulverised coal. Renewable Energy. 2020;161:867-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.148.