REDUCTION OF CHANGEOVER TIME OF BLANKING AND DIE FORGING TOOLING IN MANUFACTURING WORKSHOPS
https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2018-10-20-28
Abstract
PURPOSE. Modern machine-building industry tends to decrease the output of batch production and increase the use of universal equipment. The purpose of this article is development of an automated sorting algorithm of microelement changeover between the inner and outer changeover in order to reduce the Single-Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) implementation time. METHODS. The authors suggest the use of MES systems and quick changeover methods with the use of the automated SMED implementation technique for optimal workshop scheduling. RESULTS AND THEIR DISCUSSION. An algorithm of automated change proposal on quick changeover introduction has been developed. It is based on the lists of objects and techniques and allows to speed up the process of SMED method implementation. CONCLUSIONS. The flexibility of piece-work production with a wide range of product and enterprise competitiveness can be improved through the use of the following optimization methods of product start-up: optimal master production scheduling by the use of MES systems and automated implementation of the quick changeover procedure.
About the Authors
A. S. Isachenko
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Zhuravlev
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Васильева З.А., Назаревич А.В. Малые и средние предприятия в машиностроении [Электронный ресурс] // Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. 2013. № 9 (57). URL: http://uecs.ru/marketing/item/2337-2013-09-09-08-54-21 (16.04.2018).
2. Синго С. Изучение производственной системы Тойоты с точки зрения организации производства / пер. с англ. М.: Изд-во Института комплексных стратегических исследований, 2006. 298 с.
3. Казимиров Д.Ю., Исаченко А.С. Формирование последовательности запуска в производство изделий одновременной кластеризацией по технологическим признакам и классам деталей // Вестник ИрГТУ. 2016. № 7. С. 24-36. https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2016-24-36
4. Исаченко А.С. Применение приоритетной двухходовой кластеризации для составления расписания запуска деталей в производство // Авиамашиностроение и транспорт Сибири: сборник трудов Всероссийской молодежной научно-практической конференции (Иркутск, 11 ноября 2016 г.). Иркутск: Изд-во ИРНИТУ, 2016. С. 218-222.
5. Полянсков Ю.В., Китаев В.Л., Гисметулин А.Р., Зайкин М.А., Лотоцкий А.М. Система оперативного планирования (MES-система) механообрабатывающего производства авиастроительного предприятия // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2013. Т. 15. № 4 (4). С. 870-875.
6. Kušar J., Berlec T., Zefan F., Starbek M. Reduction of Machine Setup Time // Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2010. Vol. 56. No. 12. P. 833-845.
7. Cakmakci M. Process improvement: performance analysis of the setup reduction-SMED in the automobile industry // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2009. Vol. 41. No. 1-2. P. 168-179.
8. Costa E., Sousa R., Bragança S., Alves A. An industrial application of the SMED methodology and other lean production tools // 4th International Conference on Integrity, Reliability and Failure, June 23-27. Funchal.
9. Culley S.J., Owen G.W., Mileham A.R., McIntosh R.I. Sustaining Changeover Improvement // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2003. Vol. 217. No. 10. P. 1455-1470.
10. Patel Chintan Kumar. Set up Reduction - A perfect way for productivity improvement of computer numerical control (CNC) set up in manufacturing company // Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research. 2013. Vol. 5. No. 8. P. 166-170.
11. Haiqing Guo. Head & Base Production Optimization: Setup Time Reduction. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009. 60 p.
12. Mohd Norzaimi Bin Che Ani, Mohd Sollahuddin Solihin Bin Shafei. The Effectiveness of the Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) Technique for the Productivity Improvement // International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). 2012. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 9-13.
13. Spaghetti Diagram // Six Sigma Material. 2014. URL: http://www.six-sigma-material.com/Spaghetti-Diagram.html (21.11.2014).
14. Cottyn J., Van Landeghem H., Stockman K., Derammelaere S. A method to align a manufacturing execution system with Lean objectives // International Journal of Production Research. 2011. Vol. 49. No. 14. P. 4397-4413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.548409
15. Palanisamy S., Siddiqui S. Changeover Time Reduction and Productivity Improvement by Integrating Conventional SMED Method with Implementation of MES for Better Production Planning and Control // International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 12. P. 7961-7974.
16. McIntosh R.I., Culley S.J., Mileham A.R., Owen G.W. A critical evaluation of Shingo’s ‘SMED’ (Single Minute Exchange of Die) methodology // International Journal of Production Research. 2000. Vol. 38. P. 2377-2395.
17. Reik M.P., McIntosh R.I., Culley S.J., Mileham A.R., Owen G.W. A formal design for changeover (DFC) methodology. Part 1: Theory and background // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 220. 2006. No. 8. P. 1225-1236.
Review
For citations:
Isachenko A.S., Zhuravlev D.A. REDUCTION OF CHANGEOVER TIME OF BLANKING AND DIE FORGING TOOLING IN MANUFACTURING WORKSHOPS. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2018;22(10):20-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2018-10-20-28
Views:
272
Email this article 