Tensile properties of thermoplastic materials produced by FDM: PLA+, TPU E95A, and TPU 60D CFF
https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2026-1-19-33
EDN: IUXLYT
Abstract
This study examines the tensile properties of thermoplastic components manufactured using fused deposition modeling (FDM). Experimental tests were carried out on samples printed from three thermoplastic materials: polylactic acid (PLA+), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU E95A), and carbon-filled thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU 60D CFF). Fifteen samples were tested using an electromechanical universal testing machine (WDW-100E, China) to determine their strength, ductility, and elasticity. The results show that samples printed from different thermoplastics exhibit a wide range of tensile properties and distinct behavior under maximum loads reaching up to 1.39 kN. To optimize the performance of components made from the studied plastics, recommendations for adjusting printing parameters were developed, along with guidance for their use in mechanical engineering, automotive engineering, medicine, and related fields. The experimental data are summarized in a comparative table, which shows that print orientation and infill structure are critical parameters. Depositing layers in the plane of the build platform provides tensile strengths of up to 60 MPa, while printing in the perpendicular orientation significantly reduces this value. Therefore, part orientation should be selected according to the anticipated direction of service loads. The results are directly applicable to industries such as mechanical and automotive engineering and shipbuilding, where high mechanical loads demand improved durability, reliability, and production efficiency.
About the Authors
D. Yu. LevinRussian Federation
Dmitrii Yu. Levin, Senior Lecturer, Department of Graphics, Design and Information Technologies in Industrial Design
14 Moskovsky Prospekt, Voronezh 394026
A. I. Boldyrev
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Boldyrev, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology
14 Moskovsky Prospekt, Voronezh 394026
М. E. Podshibyakin
Russian Federation
Мaksim E. Podshibyakin, Master’s Degree Student
14 Moskovsky Prospekt, Voronezh 394026
O. А. Riabinina
Russian Federation
Olga А. Riabinina, Postgraduate Student
14 Moskovsky Prospekt, Voronezh 394026
References
1. Goncharova O.N., Berezhnoj U.M., Bessarabov E.N., Kadamov E.A., Gaynutdinov T.M., Nagopetyan E.M., et al. Additive technology is a dynamically developing production. Inzhenernyi vestnik Dona. 2016;4:123. (In Russ.). EDN: YJKSTJ.
2. Belousov A.V., Khrapov S.S., Ten A.V., Sadchikov N.V., Boldyreva Yu.A. Parallel FDM printer. Mathematical Physics and Computer Simulation. 2016;4:116-131. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu1.2016.4.9. EDN: XDBQHJ.
3. Ryabinina O.A., Levin D.Yu., Sviridov D.A., Aleshina A.E. Problems arising in the process of casting by the lostwax process with 3D printing using the FDM method. In: Development prospects of the processing technology and equipment in mechanical engineering: Collected scientific articles of the 2nd All-Russian scientific and technical conference. 11–12 April 2024, Voronezh. Voronezh: Universitetskaya kniga; 2024, р. 304-308. (In Russ.). EDN: NNOYIB.
4. Balashov A.V., Markova M.I. Study of the structure and properties of products obtained by 3D printing. Inzhenernyi vestnik Dona. 2019;1:66. (In Russ.). EDN: LSMZMB.
5. Petrov V.M., Bezpal’chuk S.N., Yakovlev S.P. 3D-printing from plastics: inner structure influence on the strength. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S.O. Makarova. 2017;9(4):765- 776. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2017-9-4-765-776. EDN: ZEUQGN.
6. Levin D., Kuzovkin А. Laser polishing as method of improving surface quality of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts made by metal-filled plastic. In: Anthropocentric sciences in education: challenges, transformations, resources: Collected scientific articles of the International forum of professional education. 9–10 April 2024, Voronezh. Voronezh: Voronezh State Technical University; 2024, p. 350-353. (In Russ.). EDN: LXPTJB.
7. Balasubramanian M., Saravanan R., Yang Yo‑Lun, Sathish T., Shanmugam V. Exploring the synergistic influence of FDM parameters and strain rate on tensile strength and failure mechanism of FDM printed PLA. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2024;10(4):2765-2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00782-y.
8. Levin D.Yu., Podshibyakin М.E., Riabinina O.А., Boldyrev A.I. Experimental study of different methods for post-processing plastic parts manufactured by 3D printing. iPolytech Journal. 2025;29(3):322-335. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2025-3-322-335. EDN: OPPOEU.
9. Zapolskii I.S., Levin D.Yu., Ryabinina O.A. Analysis of problems arising during operation of desktop 3D printers with an open type of design. In: Bulletin of Tula State University. Automation: problems, ideas, solutions “APIR-28” Collected scientific works of the National scientific and technical conference with international participation. 13–15 November 2023, Tula. Tula: Tula State University; 2023, р. 249-252. (In Russ.). EDN: FKOCZF.
10. Khodaee A., Abedini V., Kami A. Effects of fused filament fabrication (FFF) process parameters on tensile and flexural properties of ABS/PLA multi-material. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2024;46:628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05189-y.
11. Mathew A., Kishore S.R., Tomy A.T., Sugavaneswaran M., Scholz S.G., Elkaseer A., et al. Vapour polishing of fused deposition modelling (FDM) parts: a critical review of different techniques, and subsequent surface finish and mechanical properties of the post-processed 3D-printed parts. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2023;8:1161- 1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00391-7. EDN: ASYRUS.
12. Kumar R., Sharma H., Saran C., Tripathy T.S., Sangwan K.S., Herrmann C. A comparative study on the life cycle assessment of a 3D printed product with PLA, ABS & PETG materials. Procedia CIRP. 2022;107:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.04.003.
13. Corapi D., Morettini G., Pascoletti G., Zitelli C. Characterization of a polylactic acid (PLA) produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2019;24:289-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.02.026.
14. Faizaan M., Shenoy Baloor S., Nunna S., Mallya R., Rao Udupi S., Ramanath Kini Ch., et al. A study on the overall variance and void architecture on MEX-PLA tensile properties through printing parameter optimization. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):3103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87348-2. EDN: WINNDL.
15. Farid M.I., Wu Wenzheng, Li Guiwei, Zheng Aodu, Zhao Yu. Superior tensile properties of FDM 3D-printed TPU/ETPU layered structure. Journal of Materials Research. 2024;39(14):2051-2066. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-024-01365-x. EDN: ULVSVV.
16. Nofar M., Mohammadi M., Carreau P.J. Effect of TPU hard segment content on the rheological and mechanical properties of PLA/TPU blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2020;137(45):е49387. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49387. EDN: PGQXAN.
17. Emami N. Additive manufacturing of TPU and hybrid TPU-PLA formwork for custom repetitive precast concrete. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2024;30(3):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeied.aeeng-1764. EDN: DBHKSP.
18. Murali A., Subhash N.N., Deepu D.R., Velayudhan S., Parameswaran R. Design of experiment to optimize the printing parameters on tensile properties of 3D printed ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA). Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2024;10(8):5507-5523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00921-5.
19. Boldyrev A.А., Levin D.Yu., Riabinina O.А., Boldyrev A.I. On the question of reduced mass articles technological effectiveness in aviation and rocket-space equipment accessed with degenerative design. Voronezh Scientific and Technical Bulletin. 2021;4(4):29-35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34220/2311-8873-2022-29-35. EDN: ZFEYJS.
20. Aboelella M.G., Ebeid S.J., Sayed M.M. Layer combination of similar infill patterns on the tensile and compression behavior of 3D printed PLA. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):11759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94446-8.
21. Raspopina V.B., Martynova V.V., Stupina E.A. Effect of FDM printing direction on the mechanical properties of products. iPolytech Journal. 2024;28(4):477-487. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2024-4-477-487. EDN: GFOMXF.
Review
For citations:
Levin D.Yu., Boldyrev A.I., Podshibyakin М.E., Riabinina O.А. Tensile properties of thermoplastic materials produced by FDM: PLA+, TPU E95A, and TPU 60D CFF. iPolytech Journal. 2026;30(1):19-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2026-1-19-33. EDN: IUXLYT
JATS XML























